IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Nitin Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 6298 of 2022
Decided On : 28-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement details and agreement. (Para 1) |
| 2. quashing of fir based on settlement. (Para 2) |
| 3. disposition of the petition. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 24637/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6298/2022
1. Statement of Respondent no.2/Ms.Diksha Bhardwaj recorded separately wherein she has stated that she has entered into a settlement with the petitioners. She married to Nitin Kumar on 01.01.2014. However, the marriage could not succeed and mutual divorce petition was filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 10.05.2022 by the Principal Judge, Family Court. She has further stated that during divorce proceedings, she along with the petitioners have reached into a settlement dated 08.12.2021 before the learned Judge, Family Court, North-West, Rohini, Delhi. As per the settlement, her husband/petitioner no.1 has to pay Rs.6,50,000/- in full and final settlement of the entire dispute. She stated that she had already been paid Rs.4,25,000/-. Remaining Rs.2,25,000/- has been received today i.e. 28.11.2022 vide demand draft No.231577 dated 14.11.2022 drawn on State Bank of India, Shakarpur, Delhi. She has stated that she has no objection if FIR No. 815/2015 registered at P.S. Shalimar Bagh, Delhi under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all other proceedings emanated therefrom are quashed. She has stated that she is making the statement voluntarily against all claims (past, present and future) without any fear, undue influence or coercion.
2. In view of the statement of respondent no.2/Ms. Diksha Bhardwaj recorded separately, the case FIR No.815/2015, PS Shalimar Bagh, under Sections 498A/406 IPC and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
3. The petition stands disposed of.
In matrimonial disputes, mutual settlements reached between parties can justify quashing FIRs if the aggrieved party voluntarily consents.
The court can quash an FIR under IPC sections when the aggrieved party voluntarily agrees to a settlement and has no objections to the quashing.
A voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes can justify the quashing of an FIR under IPC when there are clear terms and fulfillment of obligations, free from coercion.
A victim's voluntary statement expressing non-objection and confirming settlement can justify quashing FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Courts should encourage the settlement of matrimonial disputes through amicable settlement, and if the parties have reached a mutual settlement voluntarily without fear, force, or coercion, the same ....
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, allow for divorce by mutual consent.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, particularly in cases of matrimonial disputes ....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the parties, in line with the principles established in previous cases.
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.