IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Vikas Rathor - Appellant
Versus
State of GNCT of Delhi - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 6386 of 2022
Decided On : 30-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for quashing fir based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. voluntary statement regarding settlement agreement. (Para 3) |
| 3. identification of respondent by investigating officer. (Para 4) |
| 4. quashing of fir due to settlement. (Para 5) |
| 5. conclusion and disposal of the petition. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
Crl.M.A.24912/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6386/2022
1. Present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 0841/2021 registered at P.S. Dabri under section 498A/406/34 IPC.
2. Statement of Respondent no.2/Ms.Geeta recorded separately wherein she has stated that she was married to Vikas Rathore on 11.12.2019. However, the marriage could not succeed and mutual divorce petition was filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 01.09.2022 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi.
3. She has further stated that during divorce proceedings, she along with the petitioners have reached into a settlement dated 25.02.2022 before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Dwarka. As per the settlement, her husband/petitioner no.1 had to pay Rs.4,00,000/- in full and final settlement of the entire dispute. She stated that she has already been paid the full amount i.e. Rs.4,00,000/-. She has stated that she has no objection if FIR No. 0841/2021 registered at P.S. Dabri under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. She has further stated that she is making the statement voluntarily against all claims (past, present and future) without any fear, undue influence or coercion.
4. Respondent no.2 has duly been identified by the I.O.
5. In view of the statement of respondent no.2/Ms. Geeta recorded separately, the case FIR No. 0841/2021 registered at P.S. Dabri under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
6. The petition stands disposed of.
A voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes can justify the quashing of an FIR under IPC when there are clear terms and fulfillment of obligations, free from coercion.
A party may seek to quash FIR based on a mutual settlement in divorce proceedings, provided the affected party expresses no objection voluntarily and without coercion.
The court can quash an FIR under IPC sections when the aggrieved party voluntarily agrees to a settlement and has no objections to the quashing.
In matrimonial disputes, mutual settlements reached between parties can justify quashing FIRs if the aggrieved party voluntarily consents.
In cases of mutual settlement in matrimonial disputes, a victim's voluntary statement of non-objection can lead to quashing of related FIRs and proceedings.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Courts should encourage the settlement of matrimonial disputes through amicable settlement, and if the parties have reached a mutual settlement voluntarily without fear, force, or coercion, the same ....
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
A victim's voluntary statement expressing non-objection and confirming settlement can justify quashing FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.