IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Rahul Suri - Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 1117 of 2022, Crl. M.A. 9323 of 2022
Decided On : 02-12-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of marriage and settlement agreement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. quashing of fir based on respondent's statement. (Para 3) |
| 3. disposal of the petition. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Statement of Respondent No.2/Ms. Shivani Chawla has been recorded separately wherein she has stated that she was married to Rahul Suri on 5th October, 2017 and remained together with the petitioner till 28th February, 2018. No child was born out of the wedlock. However, the marriage could not succeed and mutual divorce petition was filed and decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 07th April, 2022 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, North, Rohini, Delhi.
2. Respondent No.2 further stated that during the divorce proceedings, she along with the petitioners have reached into a settlement dated 26th November, 2021. As per the settlement, she has received an amount of Rs.14,50,000/- by way of a Demand Draft bearing No. 778461 dated 7th January, 2022 (re-validated on 27th September, 2022) drawn on Union Bank of India. Respondent states that she has no objection if the FIR No.264/2019 U/s 498-A/406 IPC registered at P.S. Rajouri Garden and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. It has also been stated that she is making the statement voluntarily against all claims (past, present and future) without any fear, undue influence or coercion.
3. In view of the statement of respondent no.2/Ms.Shivani Chawla recorded separately, the case FIR No.264/2019 U/s 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Rajouri Garden and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
4. The present petition stands disposed of.
The express consent of the complainant, coupled with a settlement agreement, warrants the quashing of FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
A victim's voluntary statement expressing non-objection and confirming settlement can justify quashing FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC.
A party may seek to quash FIR based on a mutual settlement in divorce proceedings, provided the affected party expresses no objection voluntarily and without coercion.
Settlement agreements can lead to the quashing of FIRs, especially when the aggrieved party voluntarily withdraws objections, as established in this case.
In cases of mutual settlement in matrimonial disputes, a victim's voluntary statement of non-objection can lead to quashing of related FIRs and proceedings.
A voluntary settlement in matrimonial disputes can justify the quashing of an FIR under IPC when there are clear terms and fulfillment of obligations, free from coercion.
In matrimonial disputes, mutual settlements reached between parties can justify quashing FIRs if the aggrieved party voluntarily consents.
The court can quash an FIR under IPC sections when the aggrieved party voluntarily agrees to a settlement and has no objections to the quashing.
Courts should encourage the settlement of matrimonial disputes through amicable settlement, and if the parties have reached a mutual settlement voluntarily without fear, force, or coercion, the same ....
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, allow for divorce by mutual consent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.