SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Babita Gulati – Appellant
Versus
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seek electricity connection ruling. (Para 1)
2. disputes over premises and permission conditions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. electricity is essential; occupancy matters. (Para 8)
4. directions for electricity connection granted. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. writ petition disposed, pending applications addressed. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who claim themselves to be co-tenants in respect of first floor and terrace of property bearing No. B-103, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject premises'), seek directions to respondent No. 1/TPDDL to consider their application/request dated 13.10.2022 for installation of a fresh electricity connection in the name of petitioner No. 1 at the first floor of the subject premises without insisting for a `No Objection Certificate' from the lessor/landlord (respondent No. 2).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners application seeking grant of fresh electricity connection remained pending in terms of `Acknowledgment cum Notification Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top