SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Babita Gulati – Appellant
Versus
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who claim themselves to be co-tenants in respect of first floor and terrace of property bearing No. B-103, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase-I, Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject premises'), seek directions to respondent No. 1/TPDDL to consider their application/request dated 13.10.2022 for installation of a fresh electricity connection in the name of petitioner No. 1 at the first floor of the subject premises without insisting for a `No Objection Certificate' from the lessor/landlord (respondent No. 2).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners application seeking grant of fresh electricity connection remained pending in terms of `Acknowledgment cum Notification Suspension Letter' dated 15.10.2022 issued by respondent No. 1. Vide the said communication, the petitioners have been asked to provide valid ownership proof as well as `No Objection Certificate', in case, the owner is some other person.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that a Status Report has been filed, however the same is not o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top