SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sheena Jain - Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 2904 of 2022
Decided On : 05-12-2022




Reconciliation in matrimonial disputes can justify the quashing of FIRs related to dowry and cruelty if both parties wish to resolve their differences amicably.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 498A, 406, and 34 - Petition filed to quash FIR relating to cruelty and dowry offences - Parties reconciled and petitioner wishes to continue living in matrimonial home - Court quashed FIR to secure ends of justice. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Quashing of FIR - The court emphasized the importance of reconciliation in matrimonial disputes and acknowledged the parties' desire to move forward positively.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash FIR No.81/2021 after reconciling with her husband and living together for a few months.

Findings of Court:
The court decided to quash the FIR and all related proceedings to bring a resolution to the dispute.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the FIR should be quashed based on reconciliation between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that reconciliation in marital disputes can warrant the quashing of FIRs related to dowry and cruelty if both parties wish to resolve their differences amicably.

Result: FIR No.81/2021 quashed and petition disposed of.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

Crl.M.A.25389/2022 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL) 2904/2022

1. Present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.81/2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Model Town.

2. Petitioner and respondents have appeared through video conferencing.

3. I have interacted with the parties. Petitioner states that she has reconciled the matter and is now living happily in her matrimonial home. Petitioner states that she and her husband/respondent No.2 are living together as husband and wife for the last 3-4 months.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has identified the complainant.

5. Since the parties have settled the matter and now the petitioner wants to continue to live in her matrimonial home, therefore to secure the ends of justice and put a quietus to the dispute, the present FIR No.81/2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Model Town and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

6. The present petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top