SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Ramesh Kukreja - Appellant
Versus
Lt. Governor GNCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 15678 of 2022 & CM Appl. 48814 of 2022
Decided On : 06-12-2022




The court upheld that under the relevant law, commercial properties cannot be converted from license to freehold, affirming the requirement of original allottees' compliance for legal recognition.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010 - Section 45 - Writ petition challenging eviction order issued by DUSIB under the Act - The court reiterated that conversion of license status of properties was only applicable to residential properties and not commercial, and substantive rights of original allottees and their heirs must be established for protections under policy - No legal basis for claim of subsequent purchasers without mutation or compliance with policy provisions - The appeal for a discriminatory policy regarding conversions without an existing challenge rejected. (Paras 2-15)

(B) Policy Considerations - The court acknowledged that policy decisions are within the realm of the government unless it is proved to be arbitrary or perverse. (Paras 15-16)

Table of Content
1. challenging eviction orders under dusib act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. discrimination argument against dusib policy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15)
3. court's hesitance to interfere in policy matters. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 17)
4. writ petition dismissed. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 13th July, 2022 passed by the competent authority i.e. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi under Section 45 of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. Vide order dated 1st February, 2021 passed by the Dy. Director (JJR), DUSIB the Petitioner was directed to vacate his shop. This order was challenged before the Director, JJR, DUSIB which was also dismissed vide order dated 6th August 2021. An appeal was preferred challenging this order before the Competent authority which dismissed the same by the impugned order dated 13th July 2022 which is under challenge in this writ petition.

3. The brief chronology of events is that some time in 1960s and 1970s, various JJ resettlement (JJR) colonies were developed in Delhi. These JJR colonies were to be allotted on license/lease basis to persons who were dislocated during removal/demolition and eviction from various JJ clusters. Various residential and commercial plots were carved out in the said JJR colonies. One such commercial plot bearing no. 4/24, DDA Market, Dakshin Puri Extension, New Delhi-110062 was allotted to Mr. Ramesh Kukreja under the JJR Scheme. As per order dated 20th June. 2013, issued by the Department of Urban Development, Government of NCT of Delhi, Dakshin Puri Extension is one of the JJR colonies which was developed by the Government under the JJR scheme and approved for conversion to freehold to eligible occupants.

4. Initially, on 11th June, 1984 a policy was issued by the GNCTD allowing allottees to purchase the houses constructed in Delhi under the slum clearance scheme and lease hold rights over the land on which the houses were built were also granted. The guidelines for mutation of properties allotted by the slum & JJR wing, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) were laid down as per the DDA's office order dated 14th July, 1987. However, despite the extensions of the said policy for mutation, a large number of allottees appeared to have not applied for mutation.

5. Thereafter, in 2010, the DUSIB came into existence with the enactment of Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. The Slum and JJ Department was transferred to DUSIB from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). Additionally, in 2011, vide order dated 19th September, 2011, issued by the Director JJR, the collection of license fee was suspended and the DUSIB was directed to frame a policy for lease-hold/free-hold rights on the allotted accommodation in the JJR wherein fee could be charged for conversion to lease-hold/free-hold. The said policy was announced by the Department of Urban Development, Government of NCT of Delhi on 20th June, 2013. On 11th November, 2019 an office order was issued for laying down the guidelines for conversion of DUSIB properties to lease hold and free hold as also for allotment to legal heirs in case of death of the allottee. However, as per the policy, the conversion of licence status to free hold or lease hold was only applicable to residential plots in the designated JJR colonies and not to commercial properties or shops.

6. The Petitioner in this case is in occupation of a shop which are located in the DDA market of the JJR colony, Dakshin Puri Extension. It is not in dispute that the Petitioner is a subsequent purchaser from the original allottee of this plot. Neither was mutation carried out by the legal heirs of the original allottees nor was there any application for conversion from lease hold to free hold since as per the prevalent policy the said conversion was permissible only qua residential properties.

7.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top