IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Sanjana - Appellant
Versus
Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 16635 of 2022 & CM Appl. 52355 of 2022 and 52356 of 2022
Decided On : 06-12-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal history and context of property ownership in jjr colonies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding applicability of policy to subsequent purchasers. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. court's reasoning on authority and eviction related to licensing. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's views on policy challenges and eviction. (Para 16) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL.52355/2022 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.52355/2022 is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 16635/2022 & CM APPL.52356/2022(for stay)
3. The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 13th July, 2022 passed by the competent authority i.e. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi under Section 45 of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. Vide order dated 1st February, 2021 passed by the Dy. Director (JJR), DUSIB the Petitioner was directed to vacate his shop. This order was challenged before the Director, JJR, DUSIB which was also dismissed vide order dated 6th August 2021. An appeal was preferred challenging this order before the Competent authority which dismissed the same by the impugned order dated 13th July 2022 which is under challenge in this writ petition.
4. The brief chronology of events is that some time in 1960s and 1970s, various JJ resettlement (JJR) colonies were developed in Delhi. These JJR colonies were to be allotted on license/lease basis to persons who were dislocated during removal/demolition and eviction from various JJ clusters. Various residential and commercial plots were carved out in the said JJR colonies. One such commercial plot bearing no. 4/13, DDA Market, Dakshin Puri Extension, New Delhi-110062 was allotted to Mr. Bansidhar under the JJR Scheme. As per order dated 20th June. 2013, issued by the Department of Urban Development, Government of NCT of Delhi, Dakshin Puri Extension is one of the JJR colonies which was developed by the Government under the JJR scheme and approved for conversion to freehold to eligible occupants.
5. Initially, on 11th June, 1984 a policy was issued by the GNCTD allowing allottees to purchase the houses constructed in Delhi under the slum clearance scheme and lease hold rights over the land on which the houses were built were also granted. The guidelines for mutation of properties allotted by the slum & JJR wing, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) were laid down as per the DDA's office order dated 14th July, 1987. However, despite the extensions of the said policy for mutation, a large number of allottees appeared to have not applied for mutation.
6. Thereafter, in 2010, the DUSIB came into existence with the enactment of Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Act, 2010. The Slum and JJ Department was transferred to DUSIB from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). Additionally, in 2011, vide order dated 19th September, 2011, issued by the Director JJR, the collection of license fee was suspended and the DUSIB was directed to frame a policy for lease-hold/free-hold rights on the allotted accommodation in the JJR wherein fee could be charged for conversion to lease-hold/free-hold. The said policy was announced by the Department of Urban Development, Government of NCT of Delhi on 20th June, 2013. On 11th November, 2019 an office order was issued for laying down the guidelines for conversion of DUSIB properties to lease hold and free hold as also for allotment to legal heirs in case of death of the allottee. However, as per the policy, the conversion of licence status to free hold or lease hold was only applicable to residential plots in the designated JJR colonies and not to commercial properties or shops.
7. The Petitioner in this case is in occupation of a shop which are located in the DDA market of the JJR colony, Dakshin Puri Extension. It is not in dispute that the Petitioner is a subsequent purchaser from the original allot
Policies regarding land rights are within government discretion unless shown to be arbitrary; judicial intervention is limited.
A policy allowing leasehold conversion for residential properties does not apply to commercial properties, and failure to seek mutation negates occupancy rights.
The court upheld that under the relevant law, commercial properties cannot be converted from license to freehold, affirming the requirement of original allottees' compliance for legal recognition.
The court ruled that the policy for converting properties under the DUSIB Act applies only to residential plots, and failure to mutate properties renders occupancy unauthorized.
Subsequent purchasers have no legal right to claim conversion from leasehold to freehold, and unauthorized occupation and construction justify cancellation of allotment.
Subsequent purchasers have no legal right to claim conversion of property from lease hold to free hold and are liable for eviction if in unauthorized occupation.
Compliance with the terms and conditions of allotment, including prohibition on unauthorized constructions and transfer of possession, is essential to contest eviction under the DUSIB Act, 2010.
Violation of terms and conditions of the license and the prohibition of having more than one plot in one's name influenced the court's decision.
Unauthorized sale of property allotted under the DUSIB Act can justify the cancellation of allotment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.