Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
SRV Techno Engineering Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on petitioner’s structure and history (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details on contracts and agreements formed (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. disputes related to payments and projects (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. petitioner’s jurisdiction arguments in arbitration (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. allegations of law violations regarding arbitrator (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. responses against petitioner’s claims (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. respondent's counterarguments to petitioner’s claims (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. issues of msme registration and legal process (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. statutory provisions governing arbitration (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. grounds for terminating arbitrator’s mandate (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 11. court's findings on jurisdiction and procedure (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 12. court's decision to dismiss petition (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 13. final order and conclusion of proceedings (Para 48 , 49) |
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act 1996") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking termination of the mandate of the sole arbitrator app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
