SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
SRV Techno Engineering Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)--The instant petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act 1996") has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking termination of the mandate of the sole arbitrator appointed by the Delhi International Arbitration Centre vide notice dated 16th June, 2022 referred by the MSME Council in Case No. DL/10/M/SWC/00031.

2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are that the petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and its functioning includes procurement, transmission and supply of electricity within the State of Uttar Pradesh.

3. On earlier occasion, distribution and transmission of electrical energy was in the hands of U. P. State Electricity Board (UPSEB), a statutory body constituted under Section 5 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948. With the expansion of the generation unit, a government company namely, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It was wholly owned by the State of Uttar Pradesh. Thereafter a major reform was introduced by promulgation of the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top