IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Arjun Visnhu Kirpalani - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
TEST.CAS. 77 of 2021
Decided On : 07-12-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for early hearing dismissed (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petition for probate of a will filed (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. evidence supports authenticity of will (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. probate granted with conditions (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. petition disposed with future date set (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
I.A. 9243/2022
1. By way of this application, the petitioner seeks early hearing of the instant matter.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not wish to press the instant application and submits that the same may be treated as infructuous.
3. The instant application is dismissed as infructuous.
TEST. CAS. 77/2021
4. The Petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking probate of the will dated 11th June 2020 of his father, Late Vishnu Kirpalani (hereinafter referred to as the `Testator').
5. Testator was married to Late Prakash Kirpalani and out of the wedlock, two children namely Arjun Vishnu Kirpalani and Tara Kirpalani Dev, i.e., Petitioner and Respondent No.2 respectively, were born. The Testator died on 28th November 2020 leaving behind the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 as the two Class-I heirs. Vide Will dated 11th June 2020, the Testator bequeathed the entire ownership in the property bearing No. B-28, Greater Kailah Part I, New Delhi-110048 to the Petitioner as the sole beneficiary.
6. It is stated there is no other Class-I legal heir or other near relations left behind by the Testator and he was competent to deal with the said property being the absolute owner thereof. It is further stated that the Testator was in a sound state of mind and in good health at the time of the execution of the said Will and has executed the said Will out of his own choice without any force or compulsion. The Respondent No.2 has given her consent for the grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 11th June 2020 in favor of the Petitioner. The relevant portion of the no objection certificate is reproduced below:
"That as per the WILL dated 11.06.2020, I do not desire to make any claim on the House No. B-28, Greater Kailah Part I, New Delhi-110048 admeasuring 1000 Sq Yards along agree to renounce all my rights existing as well as they may accrue to me in future in respect of the aforesaid property.
I declare that I have no objection whatsoever in transmitting the House No. B-28, Greater Kailah Part I, New Delhi-110048 admeasuring 1000 Sq Yards along with superstructure thereon in the name of my brother Sh. Arjun Vishnu Kirpalani, S/o Late Sh. Vishnu Hiranand Kirpalani, R/o House No. 3, Ashoka Avenue, Chattarpur Farms, Mehrauli, New Delhi-110074 (Brother) as per registry details as follows:
The property bearing House no. B-28, Greater Kailash Part-I, New Delhi-11 0048 comprising plot of land measuring 1000 Sq yards along with superstructure thereon vide Sale deed dated 06.12.1961, Registered No 8878 in Additional Book no. I, Volume no. 739, on Pages 67-68, on 15.12.1961 in Sub Registrar, New Delhi from DLF Housing and Construction Private Limited. DLF Housing and Construction Private Limited the VENDOR had its office at F Block Connaught Place, New Delhi and executed the sale deed through its Company Secretary and General Power of Attorney Shri Ram Kishan Jain, son of Shri Banarsi Dass Jain. The Power of Attorney is dated 5th September 1956 and registered as No 516/237 in office of Sub Registrar(Nazul) Sub Dist Delhi in Addl Book No. IV Volume No. 11 on pages 174 to 178 on 6th Day of September 1956.
I am executing this no objection to be submitted to the concerned government authorities.
7. The Valuation Report in respect of the said property is as under:
| Category | B |
| Area of Land | 836 Sq. METER |
| Built-up Area | 2482 Sq. Meter |
| Minimum Rate of Land | Rs.2,45,520/- Per Square Meter. |
| Minimum Rate of Construction | Rs.17,400/- Per Square Meter. |
| Cost of Landm | 2,45,520 W 836 W 1: Rs.20,52,54,720/- A |
| Cost of Construction | 17 |
The court granted probate of the will based on clear evidence of execution, witness testimony, and lack of objections from other heirs, affirming the principles of testamentary disposition under the ....
The court upheld the validity of the will and granted probate, recognizing the consent of co-heir and the authenticity verified through witness testimony.
The court affirmed that a Will requires proof of execution by attesting witnesses, and the consent of beneficiaries underscores its validity.
The main legal point established is the requirement to prove a will by at least one attesting witness, as per Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act.
The court held that a will can be granted probate when supported by the testimony of at least one attesting witness and no objections from other beneficiaries, thereby establishing its authenticity.
The court upheld the validity of a Will based on attesting witness testimony, ruling that uncontested evidence and a No Objection Certificate from a legal heir warranted the grant of Probate.
Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 requires Will to be proved by examination of at least one of two witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of fulfilling the conditions for execution and proof of a Will as per the Indian Succession Act and the Indian Evidence Act.
The unchallenged and unrebutted testimony of the petitioner and the attesting witnesses, along with compliance with the legal requirements, proved the authenticity of the Will and entitled the petiti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.