Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Banwari Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Lok Sabha Secretariat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of employment dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding delay and need for appointment (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court analysis on delay and laches (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. justification of decision based on previous judgments and administrative rules (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. conclusion on dismissal of writ petition (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking a direction to the Respondent to appoint the Petitioner to the post of Housekeeper Grade-III in the Lok Sabha Secretariat/Respondent.
2. The narrative of the facts to the extent relevant to the present writ petition is that in 2017, Respondent advertised 27 posts of Housekeeper Grade-III in the pay band of Rs.5200-20200 with Grade Pay of Rs.1900/-, vide advertisement No. 05/2017 on a direct recruitment basis. Out of 27 posts, 2 posts were reserved for Scheduled Tribe (`ST') candidates.
3. Petitioner being eligible, applied for the post in the ST category and submitted all the relevant documents. After the Screening Test, the result was declared on 17.05.2018. Petitioner scored 32 out of 50 marks. Only one candid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
