SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
Shree Amba Industries – Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the property transaction and its assessment. (Para 4 , 6)
2. request for personal hearing under the act. (Para 5)
3. court observes the lack of personal hearing. (Para 7 , 8)
4. set aside impugned order; grant personal hearing. (Para 9)
5. writ petition disposed of with directions. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J.: (ORAL)

CM APPL. 55761/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 17476/2022 and CM APPL. 55760/2022 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking interim relief]

2. Issue notice.

2.1. Mr Ruchir Bhatia accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/revenue.

3. In view of the order that we propose to pass, Mr Bhatia says that no counter-affidavit is required to be filed, at this juncture. Accordingly, with the consent of counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal, at this stage itself.

4. This writ petition is directed against assessment order dated 26.09.2022 passed by respondent no.1 under Section 143(3), read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "the Act"]. Besides this, challenge is also laid to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top