IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Javed Khan - Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 7130 of 2022
Decided On : 23-12-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts about the marriage and disputes (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. settlement details and mutual agreement to quash fir (Para 5) |
| 3. inherent powers of the high court in quashing fir (Para 6) |
| 4. supreme court precedents on quashing in matrimonial disputes (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's reasoning for quashing fir based on settlement (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. child's legal rights preserved (Para 14) |
| 7. petition disposition (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 27619/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 7130/2022
1. The present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0702/2021 registered at PS Uttam Nagar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.
2. Briefly stated the facts are that the marriage between the petitioner No. 1 (husband) and respondent No. 2 (wife) was solemnized on 07.02.2020 as per Muslim rites and customs in Delhi. Out of the wedlock, one child namely, Master Zohan was born. However, owing to temperamental differences both the parties started residing separately and since then there was no cohabitation between both the parties. Subsequently, respondent No. 2 (wife) got registered FIR No. 0702/2021 dated 12.09.2021 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S Uttam Nagar, against the petitioners herein. Besides the aforesaid FIR, litigations emerged between the parties for Maintenance and Domestic violence. In the proceedings under section 125 Cr.P.C. before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, the parties were referred to amicably settle all disputes between them before the Principal Counsellor, Dwarka Courts. Learned counsel for the parties submit that both the parties have mutually entered into a settlement agreement dated 17.09.2022 before the learned Principal Counsellor, Dwarka Courts. The settlement has been placed on record. As the settlement, the parties were required to take the divorce as per Muslim Personal Law.
3. Moreover, as per the settlement agreement dated 17.09.2022 the parties have agreed to settle all their disputes amicably. It has been agreed that the petitioner No. 1/ husband shall pay a total sum of Rs. 18,00,000/- in three equal instalments of Rs. 6,00,000/- each to the respondent No. 2/wife towards full and final settlement of all claims including past, present and future alimony, stridhan, jewellery articles, maintenance, Dower, expenses of Iddat period, Mehar, property etc.. It has been submitted that as per the Muslim Personal Law, Talakul Hasan has taken place. In terms of the settlement dated 17.09.2022, the petitioner No. 1/husband pronounced first Talakul Hasan as per Shariat Law on 27.09.2022, the second Talakul Hasan on 27.10.2022 and the third Talakul Hasan on 28.11.2022 and the same were all duly accepted by the respondent No. 2/wife in the presence of witnesses. Further, as per the settlement dated 17.09.2022, it was agreed that the petitioner No. 1/husband shall pay Rs. 6,00,000/- each, at the time of the second and third Talakul Hasan i.e. on 27.10.2022 and 28.11.2022 to the respondent No.2 and the same stand paid. It was agreed that the remaining Rs. 6,00,000/- shall be paid at the time of the quashing of the aforesaid FIR before this Court. As per the settlement dated 17.09.2022 it was also agreed between the parties that the custody of the male child namely Zohan shall remain with the respondent No.2/wife and there shall be no visitation rights with the petitioner No.1 or the members of his family. It was agreed between the parties that they shall not file any case (civil or criminal) in any court against each other or their family members, regarding restitution of conjugal rights, maintenance and claim in property of each other etc. in the future. Pursuant to the settlement, the Talaqnama dated 28.11.2022 between the parties came to be executed. The same has also been placed on record.
4. Thus, the marriage between both the parties stands diss
The court held that in matrimonial disputes where parties have reached an amicable settlement, continuation of criminal proceedings is an abuse of process and not in the interest of justice.
High Courts can quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes when parties amicably settle, as continuance would lead to abuse of judicial process and not serve the ends of justice.
The court emphasized the power to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes when parties reach an amicable settlement, prioritizing justice and resolution over prosecution.
The power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings in cases of private nature and genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash criminal proceedings and FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, especially when the parties have a....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the court's discretion to quash criminal proceedings in cases of matrimonial disputes, emphasizing the need to encourage genuine settlements an....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the significance of genuine settlements in matrimonial disputes and the exercise of the power of quashing criminal proceedings in appropriate c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.