IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Anil Kumar Gupta (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2129 of 2007
Decided On : 04-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenges administrative decisions (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. employee's service history and pay scale context (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 28) |
| 3. prior judicial outcomes reaffirming earlier pay scale entitlements (Para 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. office memorandum applicability to veterinary posts (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 5. reiteration of technical employee's non-eligibility for higher pay (Para 42 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. rejection of higher pay scale claim (Para 48 , 56 , 59) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present Writ Petition is arising out of orders dated 04.01.2006 and 21.02.2006 of the Ld. Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT) passed in O.A. No. 2376/2004 and R.A. No. 32/2006 respectively ("Impugned Orders").
2. The Tribunal vide Impugned Orders dated 04.01.2006 & 21.02.2006 has declined to interfere with the orders dated 24.07.2003 & 15.10.2003 passed by the Respondents by which the pay of the Petitioner was fixed in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and also declined to grant a pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 to the Petitioner.
3. The Petitioner before this Court has prayed that the Impugned Orders be quashed and set aside. Further, a writ/direction/order be issued to the Respondent to revise the pay of the Petitioner and place him in the Pay Scale of Rs.8000-13500 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and to grant him all consequential benefits emanating from said revision of pay scale.
4. The Petitioner before this Court is a retired employee. He started his service career by joining Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) on 20.04.1981 as Technical Assistant (AH) T-II-3, in the pay scale of Rs.425-700. The Petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 06.01.2004.
5. The brief facts of the case relevant for adjudication of this present petition arise out of recommendations of the Central Pay Commissions and subsequent orders passed by governmental departments revising pay scales of several posts.
6. As per the recommendations of the 4th Central Pay Commission, the pay of the Petitioner was revised to Rs.2000-3500 w.e.f. 01.01.1986 by an Order dated 08.06.1987. However, the pay scale granted to the Petitioner was withdrawn by an order of the Respondents dated 10.03.1989.
7. The Petitioner being aggrieved by the withdrawal of pay scale of Rs.2000-3500 preferred an Original Application before the CAT, New Delhi. The CAT set aside the order passed by the Respondents vide judgment dated 26.05.1998, restoring the pay scale of the Petitioner to Rs.2000-3500 with all consequential benefits and continuance in pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.1986. The Respondents being aggrieved by the order passed by the CAT preferred W.P. (C.) No. 625/1998. The same was dismissed by the High Court on 18.01.1999. Thereafter, an SLP was also preferred and the same stood dismissed as withdrawn by an Order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 09.08.1999. The Department thereafter also preferred an application for review of the Judgement of this Court dated 18.01.1999 in W.P. (C) 625/1998, bearing No.100/1999. The same also stood dismissed by an order dated 03.12.1999.
8. The Respondents, after the aforesaid litigation attained finality, implemented the order passed by the CAT dated 26.05.1998 vide consequential orders dated 17.05.2000 and 31.08.2000.
9. In 1996, the 5th Central Pay Commission had made recommendations regarding veterinary posts pay scales and Non-Practicing Allowance (NPA). Subsequently, `Part B' of the Revised Pay Rules, 1997 had notified the pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 as the entry grade for all posts requiring a degree of Bachelor of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry (B.V.Sc. & A.H) with registration in the Veterinary Council of India as the minimum essential qualification.
10. The Government of India, keeping in view the recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission in respect of Veterinary Doctors possessing B.V.Sc. & A.H. with registration in the Veterinary Council of
The court ruled that the higher pay scale of Rs.8000-13500 is not applicable to Technical Assistants in ICAR, as it specifically pertains to veterinary posts as per separate guidelines.
The judgment in favor of Sh. Surender Lal was held to be in rem and not in personam, and the issue of entitlement of Technical Assistant to the revised pay scale of Rs. 2000-3500 w.e.f. 01.01.1986 ha....
The court held that without specific recommendations for pay scale upgrades from the Vth Pay Commission, the claim for enhanced pay scales by the applicants is unjustified.
Employees similarly situated must receive equitable treatment regarding pay fixation as per Article 14, emphasizing uniform application of benefits.
Court emphasizes equal treatment and fair pay for similarly situated employees under the law, allowing notional pay fixation from 1996.
Equal pay for equal work mandates uniform application of benefits across similarly situated employees, reinforcing that arbitrary denial of pay parity violates constitutional principles.
The court affirmed the principle of equal treatment under Article 14, ordering the extension of retroactive pay benefits to applicants similar to counterparts in other departments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.