Ram Sarup Lugani vs Nirmal Lugani

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

YASHWANT VARMA
Ram Sarup Lugani – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Lugani – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for impleadment of parties. (Para 1 , 6)
2. facts regarding the raghuvanshi charitable trust. (Para 3 , 5)
3. requirements for leave under section 92. (Para 7 , 8 , 12 , 18)
4. mandatory requirements and judicial precedents for leave application. (Para 9 , 10 , 14 , 19)
5. invocation of inherent powers under section 151. (Para 22)
6. conclusion: application allowed. (Para 23)

ORDER

I.A. No. 8273/2021 (Appropriate Direction)

1. This application has been preferred for the impleadment of Major Atul Dev and Dr. Neerja Lugani Sethi as co-plaintiffs or to be impleaded as parties in light of subsequent developments which are set forth in the said application. A further prayer is made for leave being granted to the proposed co-plaintiffs to institute the accompanying suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908¹ .

2. It becomes pertinent to note that the present matter is still to be registered, in stricto sensu, as a suit under Section 92 of the Code since leave to institute is yet to be granted. The prayer made in the instant application in essence appears to be to permit the individuals noted above to join as applicants in I.A No. 4760/2019 whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

YASHWANT VARMARam Sarup Lugani – AppellantVersusNirmal Lugani – Respondent

YASHWANT VARMA
Ram Sarup Lugani – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Lugani – Respondent