Bright Simons vs Sproxil, Inc

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Bright Simons – Appellant
Versus
Sproxil, Inc – Respondent

Table of Content
1. disputed domain name background (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. challenges to the arbitral award (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 16)
3. court's analysis of evidence (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
4. public policy and patent illegality principles (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. final ruling on merits of arbitral award (Para 39 , 40 , 41)

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)

I.A. 774/2020 (Delay)

1. The instant application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing the petition.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 70 days in filing the petition is condoned.

3. The application stands disposed of.

O.M.P. (COMM) 32/2020 1. The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

(a) set aside the Award dated 9 September 2019;

(b) direct Respondent No.2 to re-commence the arbitration proceedings by appointing a new arbitrator and supervise such proceedings to ensure that they are conducted in compliance with law;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CHANDRA DHARI SINGHBright Simons – AppellantVersusSproxil, Inc – Respondent

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Bright Simons – Appellant
Versus
Sproxil, Inc – Respondent