Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Bright Simons – Appellant
Versus
Sproxil, Inc – Respondent
ORDER :
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
I.A. 774/2020 (Delay)
1. The instant application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing the petition.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 70 days in filing the petition is condoned.
3. The application stands disposed of.
O.M.P. (COMM) 32/2020
1. The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs :
(b) direct Respondent No.2 to re-commence the arbitration proceedings by appointing a new arbitrator and supervise such proceedings to ensure that they are conducted in compliance with law;
(c) direct the Respondents to bear the costs of the present Petition;
(d) pass such other and further orders that this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the facts and circumstances of this case;
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the present petition are that the Petitioner is the president of mPedigree Network which is involved in the development of a range of so
The judgment emphasizes the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards, the requirement to demonstrate patent illegality, and the principles of natural justice and a judicial approach in arb....
The court established that arbitration awards can only be set aside under Section 34 if they contravene fundamental principles of Indian law or public policy, without delving into the merits of arbit....
Limited intervention of the Courts in arbitral proceedings is intended by the legislature. An Arbitral Award may only be set aside if it is patently illegal, against the public policy of India, based....
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
Limited grounds for setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and the Court's reluctance to re-adjudicate disputes on their merits.
The Court held that the impugned award with respect to Claim 7 was not well-reasoned as required by the Act under Section 31(3), and the impugned award with respect to the award in Claim 11 is contra....
The court upheld the validity of the arbitral award, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial interference and the necessity of demonstrating clear error or illegality.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of establishing a valid legal basis for challenging an arbitral award and highlights the limited scope of intervention with an award in an international commerc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
