Neetu Reu vs Puneet Reu

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Neetu Reu – Appellant
Versus
Puneet Reu – Respondent

Table of Content
1. amendment of divorce petition under mutual consent (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 14)
2. court's acknowledgment of amicable resolution (Para 2 , 6 , 18)
3. waiver of statutory period for divorce (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
4. restoration of divorce petition for mutual consent (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final disposal and court directions (Para 16 , 17 , 19)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM No. _______/2023 (amendment under Order VI Rule 17) [to be numbered]

1. In terms of the settlement recorded herein after, an application under Order VI Rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure has been handed over in court by the appellant which also encloses the proposed Amended Petition under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), being the first motion petition for dissolution of the marriage by mutual consent. The proposed petition is signed by both the parties. The application is taken on record.

2. Registry is directed to register and number the application.

3. In view of the settlement between the parties and with their consent, the Amendment to the Divorce Petition is allowed on the records of the Family Court. The Divorce Petition filed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VIKAS MAHAJANNeetu Reu – AppellantVersusPuneet Reu – Respondent

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Neetu Reu – Appellant
Versus
Puneet Reu – Respondent