SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 145

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Amit Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
Basmati Devi & Ors. & Ors. - Respondents
RC. REV. 104 of 2025
Decided On : 27-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj And Mr. Zeeshan Ahmad, Advocates With Petitioner In Person
For the Respondent:Mr.Raghav Narayan And Ms.Shiv Jyoti Sharma, Advocates

The court upheld the eviction order while allowing the petitioners time to vacate, contingent on their undertaking to comply with payment obligations.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 25-B(8) - Revision petition against eviction order - Petitioners sought to challenge the dismissal of their leave to defend application and the subsequent eviction order in favor of the landlords - Petitioners undertook to vacate the premises within 9 months and not create third-party rights - User and occupation charges agreed at Rs.2,000/- per month, with payment terms established. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Undertaking - The court required the petitioner to file an affidavit undertaking to vacate the property and comply with payment obligations, with consequences for non-compliance outlined. (Paras 5-7)

(C) Mediation - The parties agreed to refer ancillary issues to mediation, indicating a resolution of the primary dispute. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged an eviction order passed by the lower court, which dismissed their application for leave to defend. The petitioners agreed to vacate the property by 31.12.2025 and pay user charges.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the petitioners to stay the execution of the eviction order, contingent upon their compliance with the undertaking.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the eviction order and the terms of the undertaking by the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the undertaking and the consequences of non-compliance, ensuring that the landlords' rights are protected while allowing the petitioners time to vacate.

Result: Petition disposed of.

ORDER :

CM APPL. 17979/2025 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

RC. REV. 104/2025 and CM APPL. 17978/2025 (stay)

1. By way of present revision petition filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 (hereinafter, referred to as ‘DRC Act’), the petitioners seek to assail judgment dated 01.07.2024 passed by the Court of Ld. SCJ cum RC (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition, bearing RC/ARC No.27/2019, vide which the petitioner/tenants’ leave to defend application was dismissed and an eviction order was passed in favour of the respondents/landlords herein, for recovery of tenanted premises, i.e. No. F-110, First Floor, Vijay Vihar Phase-I, Near Ram Darbar Mandir, Delhi-I 10085 (hereinafter, ‘subject property’).

2. After detailed arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, submits that the petitioner undertakes to vacate the subject tenanted property within 9 months’ time and handover the physical and vacant possession of the same to the respondents/landlords on/before 31.12.2025. It is further submitted that in the meantime, the petitioner also undertakes not to create any third- party rights in the subject property. Learned counsel states that an undertaking in the form of an affidavit to the above effect would be filed within a period of two weeks from today.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection to the same, subject to the petitioner paying the user and occupation charges, @ Rs.2,000/- per month, alongwith the electricity and water charges including the arrears beginning from 01.07.2024 i.e., date of passing of the impugned order, will also be cleared in three equal monthly installments.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that the petitioner accedes to the above and undertakes to pay user and occupation charges. The gate-pass of the petitioner has been handed over in the Court today which is taken on record.

5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, undertaking that:

(i) The petitioner shall hand over the vacant, physical and peaceful possession of the subject property on or before 31.12.2025.

(ii) The petitioner shall state that the entire subject property is under his occupation and control and shall not create any third-party rights or part with possession of the subject property prior to handing over its possession.

(iii) The user and occupation charges, fixed @ Rs.2,000/- per month, shall be paid from the passing of the eviction order until the date of handing over of the vacant, physical and peaceful possession on or before 7th day of each English calendar month;

(iv) The petitioner will pay all electricity and water charges, for the subject property until the date of handing over of the vacant, physical and peaceful possession thereof;

(v) The arrears till date, if any, shall also be cleared in three equal monthly installments.

(vi) The petitioner shall remain bound by the Undertaking.

6. Subject to the petitioner filing the aforesaid Undertaking before this Court within two week from today, execution of impugned order shall remain stayed till the subject property is handed over on or before 31.12.2025.

7. In the event of default in complying with the terms of the Undertaking filed, the interim protection shall stand recalled with liberty to the respondents to take recourse to appropriate proceedings for recovery of possession, recovery of the user charges/damages at market rate from the date of the impugned order, in accordance with law.

8. At this stage, learned counsels for the parties pray that the primary dispute having been resolved, their ancillary issues for which the parties are in civil and criminal litigation with each other, be referred to mediation.

9. Accordingly, list the matter before Samadhan, Delhi High Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top