IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J.
Raja Khan - Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT) Of Delhi - Respondent
CRL.A. 238 of 2024
Decided On : 28-03-2025
ORDER :
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CRL. M. (BAIL) 457/2024 (suspension of sentence)
2. The present application under Section 389 of the CrPC seeks suspension of sentence and release of the appellant during the pendency of the instant appeal.
3. Vide the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 24.07.2023 and 24.08.2023, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 392/397/411 of the IPC. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years along with a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 1 month for the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years along with a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 1 month for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the IPC. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year along with a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 1 month for the offence punishable under Section 411 of the IPC.
4. As per the nominal roll dated 04.05.2024 received from Superintendent of Prison, Central Jail No.1, Tihar, New Delhi, the applicant/appellant, as on 04.03.2024, has already undergone incarceration for approximately 2 years 7 months including remission earned by him during the said custody period. The said custody period presently comes out to be around 3½ years. It is further submitted that as per the nominal roll, the appellant had been released on interim bail during the course of the trial and had not misused the liberty granted to him.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the sentence awarded to applicant/appellant, is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court, further subject to the following conditions:
i. The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of this Court.
ii. The applicant shall intimate this Court by way of an affidavit and to the Investigating Officer regarding any change in residential address.
iii. The applicant shall appear before this Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.
iv. The applicant shall provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer and intimate about any change.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
7. Needless to state that, nothing mentioned hereinabove is an opinion on the merits of the case and any observations made are only for the purpose of the present bail application.
8. Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.
9. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
CRL. A. 238/2024
10. List in due course.
AI
The court suspended the appellant's sentence based on time served and good conduct, allowing bail with specific conditions.
Suspension of sentence and bail granted based on the appellant's prior bail status and time served, with conditions imposed.
The court suspended the appellant's sentence and granted bail based on the survivor's lack of objection and the appellant's compliance with bail conditions during trial.
The court granted bail to the appellant pending appeal, emphasizing compliance with conditions to protect the victim and ensure legal proceedings.
The court may suspend a sentence during an appeal if the appellant has served a significant portion of the sentence and is not involved in other cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the basis for grant of bail in cases other than life sentence cases, as per the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Suspension of sentence granted pending appeal based on the Appellant's prior bail status and the acquittal of co-accused, highlighting concerns over the conviction's validity.
Suspension of sentence granted based on time served and compliance with conditions, ensuring accountability during appeal.
The court has the discretion to suspend a jail sentence under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C based on the circumstances of the case, including the conduct of the appellant and the likelihood of the appeal ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.