IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J.
Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Gupta - Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. Of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. - Respondents
CRL.A. 321 of 2025 & CRL.M.A. 8438 of 2025
Dated 28-03-2025
ORDER :
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CRL.M.(BAIL) 592/2025
2. The present application under Section 430 of the BNSS seeking suspension of sentence and release of the appellant during the pendency of the instant appeal.
3. Vide the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 14.11.2024 and 27.01.2025, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 354-A, 354- D, 509 of the IPC and Section 12 read with Section 11(i) and (iv) and Section 8 read with Section 7 of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 12 read with Section 11 (i) of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 12 read with Section (iv) of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years along with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 6 months for the offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 7 of the POCSO Act.
4. As per the nominal roll dated 26.03.2025 received from Superintendent, Central Jail No. 2, Tihar, New Delhi, the applicant/appellant, as on 26.03.2025, had already undergone incarceration for 1 month and 3 days out of the period awarded to him. The appellant was released on bail during the course of the trial and had not misused the liberty granted to him.
5. Survivor who is present in Court today alongwith her father submit that they have no objection if the sentence is suspended and the appellant is granted bail.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the sentence awarded to applicant/appellant, is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court, further subject to the following conditions:
i. The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of this Court.
ii. The applicant shall intimate this Court by way of an affidavit and to the Investigating Officer regarding any change in residential address.
iii. The applicant shall appear before this Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.
iv. The applicant shall provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer and intimate about any change.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
8. Needless to state that, nothing mentioned hereinabove is an opinion on the merits of the case and any observations made are only for the purpose of the present bail application.
9. Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.
10. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
CRL.A. 321/2025
11. In the meantime, a report be called from the Secretary, Delhi Legal Services Authority, South, before the next date of hearing, with regard to the status of disbursal of the compensation amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- awarded to the survivor vide order on sentence dated 27.01.2025.
12. List for compliance for the report on 14.05.2025.
AI
The court suspended the appellant's sentence and granted bail based on the survivor's lack of objection and the appellant's compliance with bail conditions during trial.
The court granted bail to the appellant pending appeal, emphasizing compliance with conditions to protect the victim and ensure legal proceedings.
The court suspended the appellant's sentence based on time served and good conduct, allowing bail with specific conditions.
The court condoned a 9-day delay in filing an appeal under the Limitation Act, emphasizing justice and admitted the appeal against conviction under IPC and POCSO Act.
The court granted suspension of sentence pending appeal under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for the Appellant to remain reachable.
The court may suspend a sentence if the appellant is on bail during trial and there is no immediate hearing of the appeal, subject to compliance with certain conditions.
Suspension of sentence and bail granted based on the appellant's prior bail status and time served, with conditions imposed.
The court suspended the execution of a two-year sentence under the POCSO Act pending appeal, emphasizing the importance of the Petitioner’s bail status and compliance with conditions.
The court may allow the suspension of sentences if the grounds raised by the appellant for suspension are arguable and the disposal of the appeal would consume time.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if the appellant was previously on bail and the appeal process is expected to be lengthy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.