Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma
Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. Of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CRL.M.(BAIL) 592/2025
2. The present application under Section 430 of the BNSS seeking suspension of sentence and release of the appellant during the pendency of the instant appeal.
3. Vide the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 14.11.2024 and 27.01.2025, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 354-A, 354- D, 509 of the IPC and Section 12 read with Section 11(i) and (iv) and Section 8 read with Section 7 of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 12 read with Section 11 (i) of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 12 read with Section (iv) of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years along with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in def
The court suspended the appellant's sentence and granted bail based on the survivor's lack of objection and the appellant's compliance with bail conditions during trial.
The court granted bail to the appellant pending appeal, emphasizing compliance with conditions to protect the victim and ensure legal proceedings.
The court suspended the appellant's sentence based on time served and good conduct, allowing bail with specific conditions.
The court condoned a 9-day delay in filing an appeal under the Limitation Act, emphasizing justice and admitted the appeal against conviction under IPC and POCSO Act.
The court granted suspension of sentence pending appeal under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for the Appellant to remain reachable.
The court may suspend a sentence if the appellant is on bail during trial and there is no immediate hearing of the appeal, subject to compliance with certain conditions.
Suspension of sentence and bail granted based on the appellant's prior bail status and time served, with conditions imposed.
The court suspended the execution of a two-year sentence under the POCSO Act pending appeal, emphasizing the importance of the Petitioner’s bail status and compliance with conditions.
The court may allow the suspension of sentences if the grounds raised by the appellant for suspension are arguable and the disposal of the appeal would consume time.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if the appellant was previously on bail and the appeal process is expected to be lengthy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
