SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 133

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J.
Naseem - Appellant
Versus
The State Of NCT Of Delhi - Respondent
CRL.A. 949 of 2024
Decided On : 28-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Krishna Raj, Mr. Vikas Jain, Mr. Srikant Prasad, Ms. Rashmi, Mr. Vaibhav Shishodia, Advs.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP, Ms. Mansi Sharma, Advocate, SI Preeti, PS Kalkaji, Mr. Harshit Jain, Adv. (DHCLSC) and Mr. Shubham Singh, Adv. for victim along with father of the victim, Mr. Himanshu Anand Gupta, (DSLSA), Mr. Sidharth Barua, Mr. Shekhar Anand Gupta, Mr. Mike Desain, Ms. Navneet Kaur, Mr. Anvesh Verma, Advs.

The court granted bail to the appellant pending appeal, emphasizing compliance with conditions to protect the victim and ensure legal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) POCSO Act - Section 8 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 354 and 341 - Conviction and sentencing of appellant for offences under POCSO Act and IPC - Appellant sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- for Section 8 of POCSO Act, and 1 month for Section 341 IPC - Compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- disbursed to survivor. (Paras 3, 4)

(B) Bail Application - Suspension of sentence - Conditions for bail include not leaving the country without permission, providing a permanent address, and not contacting the victim or tampering with evidence. (Paras 6)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted under the POCSO Act and IPC, sentenced to imprisonment and fined, with compensation awarded to the survivor. The appellant sought bail during the appeal process.

Findings of Court:
The court suspended the sentence and granted bail under specified conditions, ensuring the appellant's compliance with legal requirements.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail pending appeal and under what conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of ensuring the appellant's compliance with conditions to prevent interference with the case and protect the victim's rights.

Result: Application allowed and disposed of accordingly.

ORDER :

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 1700/2024

2. The present application under Section 430 of the BNSS seeks suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of the present appeal.

3. Vide the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 27.01.2024 and 09.09.2024 respectively, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 8 of the POCSO Act and Sections 354, 341 of the IPC. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for 2 months for the offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The appellant has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 month for the offence punishable under Section 341 of the IPC.

4. In terms of the order dated 17.02.2025, a report dated 26.03.2025 from Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority, South East, has been placed on record, wherein it is reflected that the compensation of Rs. 2,50,000/- has been disbursed and credited into the account of the survivor. Father of the survivor is present in court and confirms the same.

5. The sentence of the appellant was suspended for a period of 30 days by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 09.09.2024. The Predecessor Bench of this Court granted interim bail to the present applicant vide order dated 09.10.2024.

6. In totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the sentence awarded to applicant/appellant, is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court, further subject to the following conditions:

i. Appellant will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

ii. Appellant shall provide permanent address to the Trial Court. The appellant shall intimate the Court by way of an affidavit and to the IO regarding any change in residential address.

iii. Appellant shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.

iv. Appellant shall provide all mobile numbers to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the IO concerned.

v. Appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the complainant/victim or any member of the complainant/victim’s family or tamper with the evidence of the case.

7. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

8. Needless to state that, nothing mentioned hereinabove is an opinion on the merits of the case and any observations made are only for the purpose of the present bail application.

9. Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.

10. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.

CRL.A. 949/2024

11. List in due course.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top