SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 220

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Swarana Kanta Sharma
Sunder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajkumar, APP

ORDER :

CRL. M. (BAIL) 294/2025 (Suspension of Sentence)

1. By way of instant application, the applicant seeks suspension of sentence during the pendency of the present appeal. It is stated that vide impugned judgment dated 18.11.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (FTSC) RC-01, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in SC No. 334/2020, the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 354B/328/342 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’) and vide order on sentence dated 16.12.2024, he has been sentenced to undergo (i) rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence under Section 354B of IPC with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months, (ii) rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence under Section 328 of IPC with fine of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month, (iii) rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 342 of IPC with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. It was further directed that al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top