SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 207

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Amit Sharma, JJ.
Moirangthem Anand Singh - Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency (NIA) - Respondent
CRL.A. 918 of 2024
Decided On : 02-04-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M Gunedhor Singh, Mr. David Ahongsangbam, Mr. S Gunabanta Meitei & Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SPP, with Mr. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Jatin, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Amit Rohila & Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advs. for NIA, DSP Neeraj Mishra, CIO, NIA.

The court established that under Section 43D(5) of UAPA, a higher threshold for bail exists, requiring a prima facie case against the accused, which was met due to serious allegations of conspiracy and possession of illegal arms.

Headnote:(A) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 18, 18B, 39, 120B, 121A, 122 IPC - Bail application - Dismissal of bail application of the Appellant, who was arrested in connection with a transnational conspiracy linked to ethnic unrest in Manipur, involving possession of looted arms - Prima facie case established against the Appellant for conspiracy and possession of illegal arms - The Appellant was apprehended wearing camouflage clothing and in possession of weapons looted from State Armouries, indicating serious implications for public order and national security. (Paras 5, 11, 12, 60, 70)

(B) Bail - Under Section 43D(5) of UAPA, the threshold for granting bail is higher, requiring the court to find reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation is prima facie true - The Appellant failed to satisfy the tripod test for bail, indicating a risk of influencing witnesses and flight risk. (Paras 38, 60, 70)

Facts of the case:
The Appellant was arrested while in possession of illegal arms during a period of ethnic unrest in Manipur, linked to a broader conspiracy involving Myanmar-based terror outfits. The Appellant claimed to be a volunteer protecting his community.

Findings of Court:
The court found a prima facie case against the Appellant, emphasizing the serious nature of the allegations and the potential for influencing witnesses.

Issues: The main issues included whether the Appellant posed a flight risk and whether he could influence witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Appellant's involvement in a serious conspiracy and possession of illegal arms warranted denial of bail, given the potential for further unrest.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been held through hybrid mode.

2. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant - Moirangthem Anand Singh challenging the impugned order dated 24th August, 2024 by which his bail application has been dismissed by the Special NIA Court in RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI.

3. The present case is intricately linked to multiple FIRs arising from distinct yet interrelated incidents. In the interest of clarity, the Court considers it appropriate to provide a comprehensive summary of the background facts.

Brief Background

4. This appeal arises in the backdrop of the conflict in Manipur between the Meitei and Kuki communities. At the relevant time, there were reports of several government armouries being looted by mobs in 2023. In this regard, various FIRs were filed by the Manipur State Police. One such FIR is FIR No. 54(05)2023 filed by PS Heingang, in respect of an incident of looting from the Arms Kote of Manipur Police Training College, Pangei (hereinafter ‘MPTC’). The same was thereafter transferred to CBI and was re-registered as RC/6(S)/2023/C81/SC8/Kolkata on 9th June, 2023 (hereinafter ‘CBI FIR’).

5. Subsequently, another FIR, being RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI (hereinafter ‘NIA FIR’) was registered on 19th July, 2023 by the National Investigation Agency, New Delhi (hereinafter ‘NIA’), under Sections 120B, 121A & 122 IPC & Sections-18,18B & 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter ‘UAPA’) based on certain intelligence about a transnational conspiracy being executed in Manipur which was alleged to be abetted by Myanmar-based terror outfits aiming to wage war against the Government of India. The suspected offence in the said FIR is as under: “Credible Inputs have been received in respect of a transnational conspiracy hatched by Myanmar based leadership of terror outfits operationally active in the North Eastern Indian stales to exploit the current ethnic unrest in the state of Manipur to wage a war against Government of India and execute terrorist attacks thereby exacerbating the current security situation in the Manipur.”

6. On 3rd September, 2023, owing to the continued disturbances in the State of Manipur, District Magistrate, Imphal East promulgated Section 144 of Cr.P.C in Imphal East. During the said period, on 6th September, 2023 at about 20:00 hours, the team of Special Commando Unit of Manipur Police was deployed for checking and frisking duty of passing vehicles at Kongba Wangkhei Road near Meitei Mayek High School.

7. During one such checking, the team is said to have intercepted a white coloured Mahindra Bolero vehicle bearing registration no. MN-06LB-6905 in which admittedly the Appellant and four other individuals were caught wearing camouflaged clothes (resembling CDO, Manipur Police Uniform) along with various weapons. The description of the weapons that were recovered from their possession are as follows:

(i) 1(one) INSAS Rifle bearing no 18531215 having 4(four) magazine with 78 live rounds;

(ii) 1 (one) SLR rifle bearing no 58478 having 3(three) magazine with 50 live rounds and;

(iii) 2 (two) .303 Rifles bearing no. D91642 and E90617 with l (one) magazine each containing 5 live rounds in each magazine.

8. These weapons were identified to be a part of the set of weapons looted by mobs from various armouries including Arms Kote, MPTC. The PS Porompat, Manipur Police registered FIR No. 1234(09)023 (hereinafter ‘Manipur FIR’) in this regard and arrested the Appellant and the other four co-accused on 17th September, 2023.

9. On the same day, all the five accused in the Manipur FIR were produced before the concerned Special Judge, NIA in Imphal, by the Manipur Police seeking police custody for a period of 9 days. At that time, a report was filed Mr. R.K. Tejbir Singh, Investigating Officer (IO) of the Manipur FIR which stated as under:

“2. The brief fact of the case is that on 16/09/2023 at around 7:30 pm, on received of an information from reliable source, a combined team of Imphal Ea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top