SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 246

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh
Yogender Sagar – Appellant
Versus
Bses Ypl – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Petitioner in person.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate.

ORDER :

CM APPL. 59/2025

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 23/2025 

3. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner challenging the alleged excess bill for Rs.13,56,198/- issued by BSES YPL/Respondents in respect of Enforcement of CAW No. 401660111 dated 20.09.2024. Petitioner also claims compensation and litigation expenses as well as a direction to the Respondents to reconnect the electricity connection which was disconnected on 15.11.2024.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents on advance copy of the writ petition, on instructions, submits that the electricity of the premises in question bearing No. D-116, Gali No. 5, Kamal Vihar, Delhi- 110094 has been disconnected as there are outstanding dues payable by the Petitioner in the sum of Rs.13,56,198/- and as the bill reflects Petitioner has indulged in meter tampering leading to fraudulent and dishonest abstraction of energy. Learned counsel raises an objection to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that only the Special Court constituted under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (‘2003 Act’) is vested with the power und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top