SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 260

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 
GIRISH KATHPALIA
Public Works Department – Appellant
Versus
Malti Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Avni Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J.

1. The legal and factual matrix in the captioned petitions being the same, the petitions are taken up together for disposal. By way of these petitions, brought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, orders dated 29.07.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act have been assailed. By way of the impugned orders dated 29.07.2024, the appeals filed by the petitioner under Section 7(7) of the Act were dismissed on two grounds viz. bar of limitation and failure to deposit the awarded amount. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner at length, I am unable to find it a fit case to even issue notice.

2. Briefly stated, the circumstances leading to these petitions are as follows. Vide orders dated 06.03.2023, the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act allowed the claim applications filed by the present respondents. The petitioner filed appeals dated 14.05.2024, received in the appellate authority on 04.07.2024. The appeals being clearly time barred, the learned Appellate Authority examined the issue of limitation in detail. The only explanation for delay in filing those appeals was the tim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top