Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, R.SAKTHIVEL
Joint Registrar/Administrator, The Vellore Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner of Labour, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee applications for gratuity (Para 2) |
| 2. request for appeal due to late payment (Para 3) |
| 3. limitation period for appeals (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. time limit defined by gratuity act (Para 6) |
| 5. court validation of statutory time limits (Para 7) |
| 6. dismissal of appeals (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
R. SAKTHIVEL, J.
Considering the simple nature of the issue involved, these writ appeals were taken up for hearing at the admission board.
2. The third respondent in all the captioned writ appeals were employees under the appellant - sugar mill. They submitted individual applications under Rule 7 of 'the Tamil Nadu Payment of Gratuity Rules, 1973' ['Gratuity Rules' for short] vide Form I in the month of July 2019 and December 2019 to the employer/Appellant. There was no response from the appellant on the applications. Hence, they filed application under Rule 10 of the Gratuity Rules, 1973 to the competent authority / second respondent herein for direction. After hearing both sides, the second respondent determined the gratuity amounts by following the procedure under Rule 11 of the Gratuity Rules and passed Orders under Section 7 (4) of 'the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972' ('Gratuity Act' for
Appellate authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act has no jurisdiction to entertain appeals filed beyond the statutory 120-day limit from the receipt of the order, and sufficient cause does not ex....
The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot condone delays beyond 120 days for filing appeals, and strict compliance with deposit requirements is mandatory.
Appellate authority correctly rejected 82-day delay condonation under Section 7(7) beyond 120-day limit in gratuity appeal.
Condonation of delay in gratuity appeal valid if filed within 120 days on sufficient cause under Section 7(7) proviso.
The court upheld the right to appeal against the Controlling Authority's decision on gratuity and allowed the delay in filing, while staying recovery proceedings until the appeal is resolved.
The court upheld the right of the petitioner to appeal against the gratuity order and clarified the implications of employment status on gratuity entitlements under the Act.
The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act is bound by limitation periods and must adjudicate appeals filed timely, while the inclusion of muster roll periods in gratuity calculations ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
