Nand Lal Singh vs State Through SHO Ps Adarsh Nagar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Del) 265

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Nand Lal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Through SHO Ps Adarsh Nagar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dinesh Malik (DHCLSC) & Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shoaib Haider, S.I. Rahul Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar

ORDER :

CRL. M.A. 166/2025 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Application is disposed of.

CRL. M. (BAIL) 18/2025

3. The present Application under Section 430 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 389 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the Appeal.

4. Vide Judgment dated 25.07.2024, the Appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Vide Order on Sentence dated 26.10.2024, the Appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years with a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default, the Appellant is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of 15 days.

5. It is submitted that the Appellant has been confined to jail from 11.11.2019 without remission out of total sentence of 20 years.

6. Considering the Judgment dated 25.07.2024 and Order on Sentence dated 26.10.2024, the sentence of the Appellant is suspended, till the pendency of the Appeal, subject to the following conditions:-

a) The Appellant/Accused

Click Here to Read the rest of this document