IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AJAY DIGPAUL
Ihome And Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petitions under section 442 bnss initiated. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute regarding nature of cheques: security vs liability. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. asj's interpretation of suppression of legal principles by trial court. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. focus on prima facie nature of review for deposit orders. (Para 9 , 30) |
| 5. importance of clauses in buy-back agreement with pdcs. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. financial hardship arguments need substantiation. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. co-accused directors not liable if non-signatories. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. maintaining the need for deposit under section 148. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. counter arguments against interpretations of maintainability. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. paragraph challenge to maintainability not barred. (Para 29) |
| 11. interpretation of orders under section 148 in revision context. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 12. section 148 orders subject to judicial discretion. (Para 40) |
| 13. judicial exercise of discretion in requiring deposits. (Para 43 , 44 , 49) |
| 14. concluding dismissal of revision petitions. (Para 50 , 51) |
JUDGMENT :
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
1. The present revision petitions have been instituted under Section 442 read with Section
Jamboo Bhandari v. Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
Surender Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S. Deswal v. Virender Gandhi
Muskan Enterprises v. State of Punjab
Gurudatta Sugars Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Prithviraj Sayajirao Deshmukh
Sampelly Satyanarayana Rao v Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd.
M/s Indus Airways Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Magnum Aviation Pvt. Ltd.
The appellate court can waive the deposit under Section 148 of the NI Act when it finds the trial court's orders manifestly flawed, allowing for meritorious appeals.
The Appellate Court has discretion under Section 148 of the N.I. Act to waive the deposit requirement in exceptional cases, contrary to previous interpretations.
The court established that conditions for suspension of sentence must be justified with reasons, considering the accused's financial situation and prior payments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.