Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT BANSAL
Naresh @ Goga – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT) Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal conviction details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court's procedural actions and appointments. (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments for concurrent sentences (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appointment of amicus curiae (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. legal principles under section 427 crpc (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. supreme court observations on pocso act (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. application of legal principles to current case (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. conclusion and order of court (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
CRL.A. 600/2020 & CRL.A. 196/2022 & CRL.A. 70/2022 & CRL.M.A. 21647/2022 in CRL.A. 196/2022 & CRL.M.A. 21910/2022 in CRL.A.70/2022
1. CRL.M.A. 21647/2022 in CRL.A. 196/2022 and CRL.M.A. 21910/2022 in CRL.A. 70/2022 have been filed by the appellant/applicant under Section 427 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking concurrent running of sentences awarded to the appellant in the above captioned appeals.
2. In CRL.A. 600/2020, vide order dated 21st December, 2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, the appellant was convicted for the offences under Sections 448 /354/354C/506 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
