Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RUCHI KALRA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SLOWFORM MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
INDEX TO THE JUDGMENT
| 1. | PRELUDE |
| 2. | SUIT IN NUTSHELL |
| 3. | THE CONTROVERSY |
| Earlier suit | |
| Present Suit | |
| 4. | APPLICATION UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 of CPC |
| 5. | ORAL REPLY TO APPLICATION UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OFCPC |
| 6. | APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC |
| 7. | REPLY TO APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2OF CPC |
| 8. | ANALYSIS OF APPLICATION UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OFCPC |
| Delineating the jurisprudential horizon of Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC | |
| Decoding the ambit of 'publication' in defamation | |
| Chalking down the contours of re-publication in the context of defamation | |
| Application of Order II Rule 2 CPC in case of continuous cause of action | |
| The conundrum of Hyperlinking – Republication or not? | |
| Meaning of hyperlinking | |
| Whether every hyperlinking will amount to republication? | |
| Analysis of the hyperlinks in the article dated 07.10.2024 | |
| 9. | ANALYSIS OF APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 |
I.A. 46557/2024 (under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC)
I.A. 2506/2025 (under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC)
PRELUDE
“In this race of technology, the law must be the charioteer steering the course of technology, not a bystander watching its lightning sprint. When the tide of technology rises, the law cannot remain anchored in the pas
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
