SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 1003

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
M/S SUNRISE ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
IRRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appointment of arbitrator based on contractual disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. details on dispute resolution mechanism. (Para 9)
3. jurisdiction of the court under a&c act. (Para 10)
4. agreement on arbitrator qualifications and appointment. (Para 11 , 12)
5. necessity of appointing independent arbitrator. (Para 13 , 14)
6. order allowing appointment and preserving rights. (Para 15 , 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J.

1. The present petition filed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as ‘the A&C Act’) seeks appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in the context of a Letter of Acceptance (LoA) dated 16.03.2023 bearing No.EE/CD-XIII/Acs/2022- 23/83/6434, awarded to the petitioner for the works of ‘Maintenance of Mungleshpur Drain from RD 0m to 10362m 2711-Revenue’ at a contract price of Rs.16,90,716/-

3. As per the letter dated 27.03.2023, bearing No. EE/CDXIII/Acs/2022-23/83/6619, the stipulated date for commencement of the works was 31.03.2023 and completion was 26.09.2023. Further, in compliance of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top