IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Aeiforia Constructions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Continental Carbon India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. stay of proceedings and initial observations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual basis of the dispute (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments by petitioners regarding cheque issuance (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments by respondent on cheque liability (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. legal standards for summoning order (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. application of mind in judicial decisions (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. essential ingredients of section 138 ni act (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court's final decision on maintaining the summoning order (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J.
By way of the present petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('Cr.P.C'), the petitioners (accused persons) inter-alia seek quashing of summoning order dated 29.04.2023 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Digital Court-01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in criminal complaint bearing CC NI Act No. 9670/2022 in proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('NI Act').
2. Notice on this petition was issued vidé order dated 12.07.2024, whereby upon a first blush reading of the impugned order, this court was constrained to stay proceedings pending before the learned
Pepsi Foods Ltd .& Anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate & Ors.
Dashrathbhai Trikambhai Patel vs. Hitesh Mahendrabhai Patel
Mehmood Ul Rehman vs. Khazir Mohammad Tunda & Ors.
APS Forex Services (P) Ltd. vs. Shakti International Fashion Linker
Shiv Kumar vs. Ramavtar Agarwal
Sripati Singh vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Rajiv Thapar vs. Madan Lal Kapoor
Sunil Todi vs. State of Gujarat
Dy. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports vs. Roshanlal Agarwal
Issuance of summons in criminal cases must reflect a Magistrate's application of mind to the complaint’s allegations and the supporting evidence, ensuring valid grounds for proceeding under section 1....
A director's personal endorsement of a cheque can implicate a company in liability under the NI Act, reinforcing the scrutiny necessary in summoning orders.
The court emphasized the limited scope of inquiry at the stage of issuance of summons under Section 138 of the NI Act and the applicability of the rebuttable presumption under Section 139 of the NI A....
The Magistrate must provide sufficient reasoning when summoning an accused, reflecting a proper application of mind to the facts and law, as established in relevant case law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that compliance with legal provisions, including the conduct of an inquiry as required under Section 202(1) Cr.P.C., and the applicability of Secti....
For summoning under Section 138 of the NI Act, recording of statements under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. is not required, and the evidence of the complainant may be given by affidavit as per Section....
The court established that for a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act to be maintainable, specific procedural requirements must be met and reflected in the summoning order, including the prese....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.