Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M.SINGH, MADHU JAIN
State (Govt of NCT Of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellate jurisdiction under crpc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the incident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. testimonies of prosecution witnesses. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. defensive arguments by respondents. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. summary of prosecution evidence arguments. (Para 20) |
| 6. court's observations on contradictions in testimonies. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. issues related to the investigation. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 8. conclusion and trial court's reasoning for acquittal. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. arguments from appeal side regarding reliability of evidence. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. counterarguments regarding pcr evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 11. principal issues for consideration in the appeal. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 12. analysis of testimonies and evidence reliability. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 13. discussion on evidence and investigatory shortcomings. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 14. court upholds trial court's findings. (Para 45) |
| 15. final conclusion and order regarding acquittal. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
JUDGMENT :
MADHU JAIN, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 378 (1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter,
The prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictions in eyewitness testimonies, unreliable recovery of the weapon, and a defective investigation.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; lapses in investigation and reliance on questionable evidence necessitate acquittal.
Mere failure of the prosecution in producing reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory relating to the weapon of offence and the blood-stained earth and clothes would not derogate from the veracit....
Point of law: Every person who witnesses a murder reacts in his own way. Some are stunned, become speechless and stand rooted to the spot. Some become hysteric and start wailing. Some start shouting ....
A reasonable doubt is not a mere possible doubt but a fair doubt based upon reasons and common sense – It must grow out of evidence in the case – When a reasonable doubt arises in a matter, benefit o....
The court upheld convictions for murder against the appellants, affirming that eyewitness testimony, supported by corroborative evidence, was reliable, and distinctions made in witnesses did not affe....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimony and lack of evidence led to the acquittal of the appellants.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
