SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1803

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Sandeep Singh @ Akash – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Aakash Singla, Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Mr. Arshdeep Singh Brar, Ms. Monika Jalota Sr. DAG, Punjab

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Since both the above appeals arise from a common verdict, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, hence both the appeals (supra) are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.

2. Both the appeals (supra) are directed against the impugned verdict, as made on 29.10.2020, upon case bearing CIS No. SC/735/2017, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Ludhiana, where through in respect of charges drawn against the accused qua offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 302, 404 and 449 of the IPC, thus the learned trial Judge concerned, proceeded to record a finding of conviction against appellants- convicts. However, the other co-accused namely Aman Masih, Sonu Ali, Krishna Pandey @ Pankaj @ Golu and Sumit Parshad were acquitted from the charges drawn against them. Moreover, through a separate sentencing order of even date, the learned trial Judge concerned, sentenced both the appellants-convicts in the hereinafter extracted manner.

Name of the convicts

Under Section

Sentenced to undergo

Fine

In default of payment of fine to unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top