SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1803

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Sandeep Singh @ Akash – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Aakash Singla, Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Mr. Arshdeep Singh Brar, Ms. Monika Jalota Sr. DAG, Punjab

Table of Content
1. introduction of the appeals. (Para 2)
2. factual background of the prosecution incident. (Para 6 , 7)
3. committal and trial proceedings. (Para 8 , 9)
4. analysis of evidence and conviction. (Para 10 , 11)
5. arguments of the appellants and state. (Para 12 , 13)
6. witness testimonies and their credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. disclosure statements of raju tiwari. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. issues with evidence collection and investigation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
9. post-mortem evidence and its implications. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
10. final ruling and judgment. (Para 42)
11. conclusion and payment guideline. (Para 43)

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Since both the above appeals arise from a common verdict, made by the learned trial Judge concerned, hence both the appeals (supra) are amenable for a common verdict being made thereons.

2. Both the appeals (supra) are directed against the impugned verdict, as made on 29.10.2020, upon case bearing CIS No. SC/735/2017, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top