Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATEEK JALAN
Izaz Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State (Nct Of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bail cancellation order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. accusations of intimidation and breach of bail conditions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity of allegations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. assessment of incidents related to allegations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. petition to allow bail with conditions. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
1. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner challenges an order dated 15.12.2025, passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, by which the regular bail granted to the petitioner in connection with the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 137/2025, registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri, under Sections 109 (1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was cancelled.
A. FACTS
2. The aforesaid FIR was registered on 14.02.2025, in respect of injuries caused to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein, in an incident which took place at 12:30 AM on the same day. They alleged that they were hit by a scooty which was carrying 6-7 boys, being driven in rash and negligent manner. This led
A court must cancel bail based on verified evidence of intimidation, not mere allegations, to uphold the presumption of innocence.
Bail should not be cancelled without clear evidence of violation of conditions or misuse of liberty, as established by the court's analysis.
The main legal point established is that suppression of vital facts and misrepresentation in bail applications can lead to the cancellation of bail. The Court also emphasized that bail should not be ....
Cancellation of Bail – Court while granting bail has not considered the nature and gravity of the accusations, severity of the punishment in the event of bail, likelihood of repetition of the offence....
The court has the authority to cancel bail if the order suffers from serious infirmities resulting in miscarriage of justice, and if the accused misuses their liberty, interferes with the investigati....
The court emphasized that bail should be denied if the accused's conduct poses a risk to the judicial process, particularly in cases involving serious offences and repeated criminal activity.
Cancellation of bail requires substantial evidence of misuse or supervening circumstances; mere allegations without corroboration are insufficient.
Bail cancellation requires evidence of supervening circumstances or misuse like witness threats; absent proof, bail not cancelled. Informant's demand for money to compromise constitutes interference ....
High standards for proof required to cancel bail, focusing on direct relevance to bail conditions.
The court ruled that bail can be cancelled if the accused engages in further criminal conduct post-release, reflecting a disregard for the law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
