IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Ramagundam Fertilizers And Chemicals Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SACHIN DATTA, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the encashment/forfeiture of the Bank Guarantee towards the Earnest Money Deposit (hereinafter referred as “EMD-BG”) amounting to Rs. 47,50,000/- by the respondent no.1/Ramagundam Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. The said EMD-BG was furnished on 16.12.2015 (with a validity up to 27.12.2016) by the petitioner while participating in a tender dated 09.11.2015 floated by the respondent no.2/Engineers India Ltd (EIL) for the work of “cooling tower and CWTP packages for revival of Ramagundam Fertilizers and Chemicals project”.
2. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying of cooling equipments including cooling towers. Respondent no.1 is a Joint Venture (JV) company of EIL/respondent no.2 (an engineering consultancy and EPC company under the ownership of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India), National Fertilizer Ltd (NFL) and Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd (FCIL) formed for setting up gas-based Urea manufacturing plant at Ramagundam, Telangana. Respondent no.2/EIL was awarded the detailed engineering and project manageme











Union of India & Ors. vs. Tantia Constructions (P) Ltd.
Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trade Marks
National Sample Survey Organization and Anr. v. Champa Properties Limited and Anr.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Ors. v. Super Highway Services and Anr.
ABL International Ltd. and Ors. vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.
Joshi Technologies International Inc vs Union of India and Ors
K.K Saxena vs International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage
Unitech Limited and Others vs Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) and Ors.
GAIL v. Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd.
Sudama Devi (Smt.) vs. Commissioner and others.
VetIndia Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
The court established that retention of a forfeited bank guarantee is unjustified when the basis for forfeiture is invalidated by subsequent findings, underlining the jurisdiction of courts in contra....
Presence of an arbitration clause would oust jurisdiction under Article 226.
The main legal point established is that in contractual matters, the court may intervene to prevent arbitrariness or favoritism by the government bodies, especially if the actions violate the equalit....
Reimbursement of amount - Entitlement of - Grant of relief of this nature would virtually amount to a money decree. Petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to remedies available by raising such a c....
A writ of mandamus can be issued in contractual disputes involving public sector banks if their actions violate principles of public law or public interest.
A State entity must act in accordance with principles of fairness and justice in contractual obligations, and cannot withhold payments without a clear determination of dues, as this constitutes arbit....
Termination of a contract without issuing a show-cause notice violates the principles of natural justice. Force majeure claims must be decided before taking any action based on non-compliance with th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.