Mr. Raju, J. — The above writ petitions involve for determination of certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the Medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Central Act 68 of 1986), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, to facilities made available by Hospitals providing medical care and members of medical profession treating a patient, in the realm of diagnosis and treatment.

2. A brief reference to the stage and circumstances of the case which led to the filing of the above writ petitions individually would be necessary to appreciate the nature of the grievance sought to be vindicated by the parties on either side. W.P. No. 1953 of 1992 as the amended prayer stands, has been filed by two Medical Practitioners (husband and wife) for a writ of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from exercising their jurisdiction against the Medical Practitioners on the basis of the complaint filed by the fourth respondent in C.P.O. No. 244 of 1991 on the file of the third respondent District Consumer Redressal Forum. The fourth respondent claims to have approached the pet