G.S.SINGHVI, B.S.CHAUHAN, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India – Respondent
G.S. Singhvi, J.—By anORDER dated 6.2.2007 passed in Civil Appeal No. 3298 of 2005 – Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Authority) v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) and connected matters, a two Judge Bench made a reference to the larger Bench for determination of the following substantial questions of law of public importance:
1. Whether in the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of the licenses issued under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and the provisions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (for short, ‘the Act’), the provisions of the Act would prevail in view of the purpose and object for which the Act has been passed, i.e., for ensuring rapid development of telecommunications in the country incorporating the most modern technology and, at the same time, protecting the interests of the consumers and the service providers?
2. Whether Authority has powers to fix the terms and conditions of inter connectivity between service providers, in respect of all the licenses, irrespective of the fact whether licenses issued before or after 24.1.2000 - especially in view of the non-obstante clause in sub-section (1) of S
Cellular Operators Association of India v. Union of India (2003) 3 SCC 186. (Para 6.3)
Delhi Science Forum v. Union of India (1996) 2 SCC 405. (Para 17)
PTC India Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (2010) 4 SCC 603. (Para 25)
V.S. Rice & Oil Mills v. State of A.P. AIR 1964 SC 1781. (Para 28)
State of Tamil Nadu v. Hind Stone (1981) 2 SCC 205. (Para 29)
K. Ramanathan v. State of Tamil Nadu
Quarry Owners’ Association v. State of Bihar (2000) 8 SCC 655. (Para 33)
U.P. Coop. Cane Unions Federation v. West U.P. Sugar Mills Association (2004) 5 SCC 430. (Para 34)
Afzal Ullah v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1964 (4) SCR 991. (Para 38)
Sibnath Banerji’s case, Santosh Kumar Jain v. State
Om Prakash v. Union of India (1970) 3 SCC 942. (Para 41)
Shiv Kirpal Singh v. V.V. Giri
Academy of Nutrition Improvement v. Union of India (2011) 8 SCC 274. (Para 42)
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261. (Para 47)
Cellular Operators Assn. of India v. Union of India (2003) 3 SCC 186. (Para 48)
Union of India v. TATA Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 517. (Para 48)
Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (2010) 11 SCC 1. (Para 48)
Narinder Chand Hem Raj v. Lt. Governor
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. v. Union of India (1985) 1 SCC 641. (Para 50)
Raman and Raman Ltd. v. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.