SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, V.K.JAIN, M.SHREESHA
Manu Solanki – Appellant
Versus
Vinayaka Mission University (formerly known as Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation deemed University) – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Students/Complainants:Mr. Vineet Kumar Jain, Advocate Ms. Deepasha Talwar for R-1 Ms. Mansi Bajaj, Advocate Ms. Nidhi Tyagi, Advocate Ms. Nitin Prakash, Advocate Mr. Kaustubh Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Smaran kapoor, Advocate Ms. Ruchita, Advocate Ms. Preety kakkar, Advocate Mr. Abhimanyu Garg, Advocate Ms. Ayushi Kakkar, Advocate Mr. Nicholas Choudhury, Advocate Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Advocate Mr. Aman Shukla, Advocate
For the Education Institutions:Mr. Soumyajit Pani and Mr. Chittaranjan Singh, Advocates Ms. Pooja Kashyap, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Mishra, Advocate Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Advocate Mr. Ashish Kumar (AAG) with Mr. Shakti Verma, Advocate Ms. Monalisha Kosaria, Advocate Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Narain, Advocate Mr. Bhanwar Lal Parekh, Advocate Mr. Pratap Shanker, Advocate Ms. Preeti Jha, Advocate Ms. Monalisha Harsa, Advocate Mr. Pallav Mongia, Advocate Ms. Sneha Jeetam, Advocate Mr. Anant Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Pratap Shanker, Advocate Ms. Preeti Jha, Advocate Ms. Monalisha Harsh, Advocates Mr. Abdul Rahiman Tambdi, Advocate

ORDER

The case of the Complainants in Consumer Complaint No. 261 and 267 of 2017, is that the Opposite Party University has indulged in deficiency of service and unfair trade practice by inducing them and false assurances that the University had the requisite approvals and the Complainants, who were admitted in the offshore program in 2005-2006 comprising of two year study in Thailand and two and half years study in the Opposite Party University, would be getting their MBBS final degree conferred by the Opposite Party University and recognized by the Indian Government and Medical Council of India.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Complainants submitted that after two years of study in Thailand, the students were informed that they should continue their course at Thailand and would be conferred a Foreign Medical Degree and should subsequently appear for screening test in India. Learned Counsel submitted that a Writ Petition was preferred by the Opposite Party before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras seeking permission for the Complainants’ seniors to appear in the screening test, which was allowed by the learned Single Judge. The National Board of Examination in the meantime file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top