SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Government of India – Appellant
Versus
Master Akash – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Sanjib Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocate and Mr. Virender Kumar, AR

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member.—The Appellants challenged against the impugned Order dated 11.09.2012, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), whereby the Appellants Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to pay a sum of Rs. 10 lakh holding liable for medical negligence.

2. For the convenience, the Parties are referred as placed in the Original Complaint filed before the State Commission.

3. The facts are that Master Akash the Complainant (Complaint filed through his mother), after birth, at the age of 3 days, was operated for the correction of diaphragmatic hernia on 13.06.1998. It was performed by Dr. Ajay Kumar, the Opposite Party No.3 at Kalawati Saran Children Hospital (KSCH) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Party No. 2’). During operation, the baby was given blood transfusion twice as 50ml and 100ml on 13th and 16th June, 1998. The blood was brought from the Blood Bank at Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Party No. 4 – SSKH’). The baby was discharged on 23.06.1998.

4. Thereafter, Master Akash was brought to the hospital on 06.08.1998. It was diagn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top