AVM J. RAJENDRA
Dishari Health Point – Appellant
Versus
Doyojan Bibi – Respondent
ORDER
This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 58 (1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the “Act”) against impugned Order dated 26.09.2022, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal (‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 43 of 202. In the impugned Order, the State Commission allowed the complaint and modified the decision of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malda (‘hereinafter District Forum’) dated 23.11.2021 in CC No. 35/2018.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum. The Petitioners, Dishari Health Point and Dr. Krishendu Das are referred as OP-1 & 2 respectively. While the Respondents, Mrs. Doyajan Bibi; Chief Medical Officer of Health Office, Carmichael Hospital for Tropical Disease; and National Institute of Mental & Neuro Science are referred to as the complainant, OP-3, OP-4, and OP-5 respectively.
3. Brief facts of the case, as per the complaint, are that she was admitted at OP-1 Nursing Home on 26.11.2017, for treatment of fever and weakness. Dr. Sharma, purporting to be the proprietor, assured her and her husband of the facility’s hi
(1) Revision – A revision under Section 21(b) of the Act, 1986 confers very limited jurisdiction on this Commission. In the present case there are concurrent findings of the facts and scope for revis....
(1) Duty of care – The duty of care implies that the doctor must exercise reasonable skill and care, adhering to the standards expected of a medical professional in similar circumstances.(2) Breach –....
National Commission - The revisional jurisdiction of the National Commission under Section 21(b) of the said Act is extremely limited.
Healthcare providers must adhere to the standard of care associated with their qualifications, reinforcing medical negligence principles.
“Medical Negligence” - The omission on the part of the Hospital therefore to have the patient tested for H1N1 promptly would certainly be contrary to the requirements under the aforesaid Guidelines, ....
Medical negligence – Principle of res ipsa loquitur can be invoked.
(1) Pancreatitis – Pancreatitis could be detected only much later but OPs cannot be held responsible.(2) Negligence – The patient’s treatment was based on from OP No.3, which further underscores negl....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.