SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEEPA SHARMA, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Ravi Garg – Appellant
Versus
Sukhminder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Advocate

ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The present Appeal Execution has been filed challenging the order dated 04.02.2022 in Execution Application No. EA No.133 of 2020 in Complaint Case No. CC 463 of 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘impugned order’). It is contended by the Appellant that present Appeal has been filed by the director of the judgment debtor Company i.e. M/s Sanskriti Golden Oak Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a decree had been passed against the Judgment Debtor Company in Complaint No. CC No. 463 of 2018. An Execution Application EA No.133 of 2020 had been filed by the Decree Holder / complainant and it was during the execution that impugned order had been passed.

3. It is contended by the Appellant that Decree Holder had paid a sum of Rs. 19,66,220/- to the Company and the Company failed to deliver the possession of the unit booked in the year 2014. An order of refund was passed by the State Commission in the complaint and the Execution Application was filed when the Company failed to make the payment. It is contended that Appellant in order to show his bonafide before the State Commission had submitted that Appellant is willing to pay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top