Mrunmaya Kar VS Piyush Heights (Piyush Group)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Mrunmaya Kar – Appellant
Versus
Piyush Heights (Piyush Group) – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant: In person
For the Opp. Party: Nemo

ORDER

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member.—Heard Mrunmaya Kar, the complainant in person.

2. The complaint has been filed for (i) refund of Rs.31.78 lacs with interest @ 18% p.a.; (ii) to pay Rs.10.50 lacs as the compensation for increase of land and construction price; (iii) to pay Rs.1000000/- for mental agony and harassment; (iv) to pay Rs.1200000/-, as the rent paid from 2011 till the filing of the complaint; (v) to pay Rs.13.54 lacs as gross deduction of income from 2011 till the date as rebate on housing loan.

3. The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it, are that M/s. Piyush Buildwell India Ltd. (builder) was a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development in real estate. The builder launched a project in the name of “Piyus Height” at Sector 89, Faridabad, Haryana. Mr. Vishal Sood and Ms. Ashu Sood applied for and were allotted Flat No.D-111, First Floor, Tower - D, super area 1446.07 sq.ft., Basic Sale Price Rs.2821040/-. Thereafter the complainant purchased the aforesaid flat on 23.04.2008 from Mr. Vishal Sood and Ms. Ashu Sood with the approval of the builder. The Builder Buyer’s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document