SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V. P. PATEL, A. C. RAVAL
R. N. Mehta, Member Dilipkumar Bhikhabhai Sabhani – Appellant
Versus
Manager Shri, Saurashtra Gramin Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Ms. Rajendrasinh B. Raol, Ld. Advocate

ORDER

A.C. Raval, Member—The appellant/ original complainant has filed present appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the respondent/ original opponents before the State Commission, being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Surendranagar dated 25.11.2021 in complaint Case No.831 of 2019.

2. Heard Ld. Advocate Mr. Rajendrasinh B. Roal for the appellant. This case is pertaining crop compensation under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna 2018-19 (hereinafter referred as PMFBY.) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and this case is one of the cases of group matter. Hence, this Commission has decided to hear and dispose of this appeal finally on merits at the admission stage.

2.1 The appellant is original complainant and respondent No.1 is original opponent No.1 and respondent No.2 is original opponent 2 before the District Commission. hereinafter the appellant and respondents will be referred as per their original status.

3. Facts of the case of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top