SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C. VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shirish Goel – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. V.S. Chopra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Deepa Chacko, Advocate

ORDER

This Appeal is filed against the order dated 15.01.2013 of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Commission, Panchkula (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission) in CC/6/2012.

2. Case of the Complainant/Respondent is that on 31.10.2009 he took Fire and Special Perils Policy No.312700/11/09/11/00000204 from the Opposite Parties/Appellants. The Policy covered the building located at 21/31 and 22/31, Tatarpur Jatula Road, Village Jarula, District Palwal valid from 31.10.2009 to 29.10.2010. While issuing the Policy, the Opposite Party mentioned incorrect name of the Complainant which was later on corrected. The Complainant was not supplied with the completed copy of the Policy. The Complainant, however, obtained the same by an application under Right to Information Act, 2005. On 01.05.2010 fire broke out in the insured premises due to short circuit causing loss/damage to the stock and building. Intimation of fire was given to the Fire Brigade and the fire was extinguished. Police recorded a case, vide FDR No.4 dated 04.05.2010 at Police Station Gadpuri. Intimation of fire was also given to the Opposite Party, who appointed Shri Hans Chaudhary HRC Assoc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top