SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Khadi Udhyog – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Maibam N. Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Shimpy Arman Sharma and Ms. Yashashvi Shrivastva, Advocates

ORDER

This First Appeal under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short, the ‘Act’) is in challenge to the order dated 21.12.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (in short, the ‘State Commission’) in Complaint Case No. 638 of 2018 allowing the complaint.

2. The delay of 67 days in the filing of this complaint is condoned for the reasons stated in the application for the condonation of delay in the interest of justice.

3. Briefly put, the relevant facts of the case are that the Respondent/ Complainant had availed a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy (the ‘Policy’) covering the risk for machinery, stocks and building from the appellant insurance company for the period 23.12.2015 to 22.12.2016. In the intervening night of 29-30.04.2016 a fire broke out in the insured premises allegedly due to a spark from the generator. The Fire Brigade was informed and the fire was controlled after considerable effort. The Appellant/Insurance Company was intimated about the incident on 30.04.2016. The Appellant appointed Royal Associates, Investigating and Detective Agency to investigate the alleged incident of fire and cause of fire. On the b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top