SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM
Raj Khad Bhandar – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Randhir Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Abhishek Gola and Mr. Anshul Kumar, Advocates

ORDER

The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 20.10.2016 passed by the learned Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (“the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No.41 of 2015, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein) was partly allowed.

2. For Convenience, the parties in the present case being referred to as mentioned in the Complaint before the State Commission. The Complainant is the proprietor of M/s. Raj Khad Bhandar and running Pesticides and Fertilizer Products business. United India Insurance Company Ltd. is referred to as the Opposite Party/Insurer (OP).

3. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that the Complainant obtained a standard fire insurance policy from the OP for Rs.40,00,000/- valid from 05.11.2012 to 04.11.2013. On the night of 30.10.2013, a fire erupted in the Complainant’s shop, resulting in the destruction of goods valued over Rs.40,00,000/-. Subsequently, they submitted a claim for the sum assured, but only Rs.3,27,180/- was paid. Dissatisfied, they filed Consumer Complaint No.41 of 2015 before the Sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top