SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R. K. AGRAWAL
Balmukand Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Rathi Securities Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Balmukand Joshi, In person
For the Respondent: NEMO

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the Impugned Order dated 11.11.2021 passed by the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as State Commission) in First Appeal No. 1168 of 2011, whereby the State Commission had dismissed the Appeal filed by Sh. Bal Mukand Joshi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Petitioner/Complainant’) by affirming the Order dated 06.04.2011 passed in Complaint No. 33 of 2016 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhilwara (for short “the District Forum”) vide which the District Forum had dismissed the Complaint filed by the Petitioner/Complainant.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Mr. Bal Mukand Joshi, Petitioner/Complainant opened a share trading Account No. 135 BJ 02 with Suresh Rathi Securities Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Party/Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent), who is a broker in share market. Petitioner carried out trading like, purchase and sale of share through Respondent, who in turn charged brokerage from the Petitioner. In March 2008, Petitioner purchased some shares through the Respondent, payment f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top