SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C. VISWANATH, SUBHASH CHANDRA
Amritsar Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: NEMO
For the Respondent:Mr. Updip Singh, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Member—This revision petition under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails order dated 16.03.2015 of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh (in short, ‘State Commission’) dismissing First Appeal No. 561 of 2011.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the Respondent had allotted plot no. 307 in Ajnala Road Extension Scheme, Amritsar to Smt Kartar Kaur, wife of Karnail Singh on 27.02.1992 as a local displaced person. Shri Rajwant Singh, son of the allottee intimated the respondent vide letter dated 22.04.1996 that Smt Kartar Kaur had expired on 19.11.1987. At the request of Rajwant Singh, the respondent agreed to allot the plot to him as the legal heir. However, he submitted the requisite papers in the name of his wife, Sukhwant Kaur. The respondent directed her to take possession on 12.09.1998 which was done on 22.09.1998 at which time it was seen that the plot size was excess by 197 sq yds. The respondent agreed to regularize the same which was done on 18.07.2002 on deposit of Rs.93,552.58. Subsequently, on 25.11.2008 a sum of Rs.5,33,5740/- was directed to be paid as Government Rules re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top