SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA
Manappuram Finance Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Swapan Roy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Puneet Bajaj, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Advocate with Ms. Manisha Pandey, Advocate

ORDER

Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member—This review petition filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, West Bengal (in short, ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 1195 of 2013 dated 08.10.2013 dismissing the appeal against the order of the District Forum, Barasat, North 24 Parganas (in short, ‘District Forum’) dated 08.10.2013 in Complaint No. 258 of 2013.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the respondent approached the petitioner who is a company under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of providing loans against the pledge of gold ornaments at its Sodepur branch office, District North 24 Parganas and obtained a loan of Rs 3,50,980/- by pledging various gold ornaments weighing 366.8 gms (gross, including stones)/net 308.31 gms on different dates between 03.07.2009 and 10.07.2009. The terms and conditions of the said loan required full repayment on or before 12 months failing which the pledged items would be sold by auction. As no repayment was done by August 2010 registered auction notices were issued on 18.02.2011 and 21.02.2011 which were retu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top